Old Nick
Legendary Knight
Looks good for a bit of fun, but not regular transportI think these have niche appeal
I like the idea of nuclear bikes though
Looks good for a bit of fun, but not regular transportI think these have niche appeal
This is the sort of thinking that will get us out of this mess at some point in the future - I can’t help but think our forebears will look back on us and electric powered transport the way we do now look back at our ancestors and their use of steam power
While it is alleged to be the case that the funding was pulled because the backers, I think it was JP Morgan, got wind of Tesla's desire to provide free electricity, the fact is that what Tesla thought was possible, to transmit electricity in the same way as you can transmit radio through the air with the Earth acting as a return leg of the 'circuit', is fundamentally flawed as Radio wave's and electricity don't work the same way. Of course the backers knew less about this than Tesla and so didn't know it was a blind alley and they would have lost their shirts if they hadn't pulled their investment.
Tesla's papers did disappear when he died which is hardly surprising as, just like his backers on wireless electricity, American authorities had no idea that his 'Death Ray' etc. weren't possible and so would have rushed to obtain anything that might have been dangerous to the USA if it fell into the hands of others or was put up for auction to the highest bidder.
The conspiracy theories are attractive but simple logic says that there is nothing in the Tesla ones. You can bet that, if there was a way to provide 'wireless energy' the energy companies would have figured out a way to make money out of it and grabbed it with both hands. All those pylons, tonnes of copper cabling, transformers and everything else that goes into an electrical supply network cost so much to intall and maintain and they would happily ditch it if it were possible.
Well skimming over that Emrod have a totally different, and more feasible, concept than Tesla. Tesla thought that he could create a pseudo circcuit with the air being one side of the circuit and the ground being the other, which was based on a flawed belief that Radio wave and electricity worked in the same way. It would seem that this Emrod are going to use a targeted beam, or laser fired from one point to another in 'line of sight' and the receiver would turned that focused beam back into electricity. This is all very well to transmit power from one place to another but totally unfeasible as a method of powering everyone's lives. It is to Tesla's idea as apples are to oranges.
Your electric toothbrush (for the limp wristed) 'transmits' power by using an energised coil to induce current. I bet you've even got them in your wrist exerciser (throttle machine bike thingy).Re-reading the article about Emrod I see it's a microwave beam they would use so essentially a very high power focused Radar beam. I would imaging that would lose a lot of energy in the process, being pretty wasteful and would literally cook anything that got in the way. You could certainly use it to frazzle your enemies though.
I can't remember exactly how Tesla 'demonstrated' his wireless power transmission but I believe it's quite well known how it was done and it was a trick that only works over a very short range. There is no doubt that Tesla was a great innovator and inventor but he was also of his time and was operating on things about which there was little known and I very much doubt he was 'channeling' aliens or had secret knowledge of the ancients.
There are of course a goodly number of 'free' energy sources available to us on Earth and the only problem is harnessing them in a cost effective way. The Sun, Wind and Geothermal options are all literally free energy there for the taking but our problem is figuring out 'capture' in a way that is low cost, low emission and does not create as many problems as it solves. Turbines, Wave Machines, Solar capture 'farms' etc. are all far too inefficient and far too costly to create. Transmission is a major part of the problem with Solar energy as the ideal would be solar capture plants in orbit around the Earth but. although they would capture loads of solar energy no matter what the weather or time of day on Earth, how in hell do you get the energy down to Earth safely? With wind we could have high altitude windfarms, basically giant kites, generating electricity from the winds up there but, again, how the hell do you get that energy down? Geothermal of course presents a different problem - If there isn't a locally occurring access point, Volcano or hot spring, how do you drill down the many miles into the crust to access it? Wave power has both generation and transmission problems. So far we are a long long way from a solution to how to harness the power not to generate it.
I hope you've asked her to hide it round the corner!Mrs DD brought one of these home tonight...
View attachment 15682
View attachment 15683
What a hideous little thing it is!
Made even worse by the price!
There's a pre registered one on Fleabay for £36,450
It sure am ugly.Mrs DD brought one of these home tonight...
View attachment 15682
View attachment 15683
What a hideous little thing it is!
Made even worse by the price!
There's a pre registered one on Fleabay for £36,450
Thankfully it'll be gone tomorrow morning mate.I hope you've asked her to hide it round the corner!
Who the fuck thought of putting that in a car ffs.Thankfully it'll be gone tomorrow morning mate.
Hopefully never to return!
Its only minor saving grace is a very clever dashboard.
I got dragged outside for a look & told to touch the icon that said "Aquarium"
The huge dashboard then became a virtual fish tank. You can even feed the fish by tapping the screen which drops food into the water & the fish swim towards it.
Clever, but utterly pointless
Imagine filling in an insurance claim form. And saying the accident was caused by you feeding the fish FFS!
In case you think I'm pulling your leg?..
If only the powers that be will listen, it seems they are hell bent to go down the EV route at any cost and we all know they do not like to be proven wrong. lets hope these alternative fuels will be a reality because lets face it what proportion of society is going to be electric by the proposed date, not that many as after all this cost of living mess who could afford EV transport, only the well offSynthetic fuels sound like an interesting proposition...
Only EVs from 2035 is the 'wrong way to go', say engineering experts
Mechanical Engineering Industry Association say the internal combustion engine is 'ecological and economically advantageous' and should be retained with e-fuels.www.thisismoney.co.uk