A Place For Your WTF Moments

Steve 998cc

Legendary Knight
Yep, 20mph for 300 meters outside a school makes perfect sense.
And I doubt that many folk would disagree.
Unfortunately, I'm sure you're correct about it being used as yet another way to fleece motorists.

On my regular sunny days run out there is exactly what you're describing.
i.e. a 30mph sigh as you enter a village. Almost immediately followed by a 20mph sigh for no apparent reason. Other than there being parked cars on both sides of the road.
Consequently, vehicles coming from both directions have to give way depending on which side the obstruction (parked car) is on.
Does that really req a 20mph limit, or just common sense & knowledge of the highway code? 🤔

The 20mph stretch is only approx 1/3rd of a mile long but I find it incredibly hard to stick to. As it's downhill in the direction I approach it from.

Obviously the safest way to ensure that you stick to a 20mph is to stay in 1st or 2nd gear. Which will mean increased revs. Which will mean more fuel is used & more pollution is pumped out of the exhaust. So how did the 20mph limit get past all the greenies? 🤔
Because it has nothing to do with safety just yet another way of greedy councils fleesing road users again.
 

Don the Don

Legendary Knight

Perspective is everything.
41 squadron jets from Coningsby, I quote "He added: "I love watching the pilots from RAF Coningsby practise combat manoeuvres". those feckers need too more like display and PR is Coningsby's forte, we all know Lossie bears the brunt of combat roles.................I am biased
 

DD67

The Peace Keeper
Staff member
I was VERY nearly wiped out today due to the new overtaking of cyclists law (& an extremely poor interpretation of how to implement said law)

Minding my own business & at the 60mph speed limit. I approached a left-hand bend on a country A road. I was hugging the double white lines so as to get a better view around the corner. But I was still too the left of both the white lines & consequently still on my side of the road.
Unlike the 40 something lady coming the other way in her large SUV. She was giving a cyclist well over 2 meters of clearance. Thereby putting herself with the double white lines in the road in the dead center of her vehicle. Meaning she was approx 3 feet over onto my side of the road!
She looked terrified & made no attempt to move over. Basically, I think she was frozen with fear?

It's a f#cking good job that my little Mazda is narrow. If I'd been on a bike I'd have been in the exact same position in the road. And I don't think I could have avoided the collision.

It's tempting to use my dashcam footage to grass her to the Cops. But I won't cos she was just making a total pigs ear of passing the cyclist. Whilst trying to maintain the "Required distance"
Hopefully in future she won't do so on the wrong side of the road on a blind bend FFS!?! 🙄
 

Scrappy

Legendary Knight
I came across the video below yesterday, and it got me thinking. If this mineral is low-carbon, environmentally friendly, totally natural (non GM), and safe then... Why are farmers being persecuted over fertilisers? Why are governments trying to shut down farms because of nitrogen based fertilisers? If this is going to be worth billions to the UK each year for decades, why are we being taxed to death? Will we the people see any benefit from a resource that is ours, and belongs to the people of UK, or will it be exploited and the profits be consumed by greedy corporations? Are we the taxpayers subsidising or part funding the construction, and will we get paid back?


Could it be that the fertiliser crisis is being fabricated so corporations can obtain farmland on the cheap, knowing full well that this new wonder fertiliser will be abundantly available within a couple of years?

Also, with my tin foil hat on, it would be an ideal, hidden in plain sight, opportunity to construct a massive bunker complex for some to escape the coming global catastrophe or zombie apocalypse. 🤔
 
Last edited:

DD67

The Peace Keeper
Staff member
So he's a liar, isn't that one of the qualifications required to achieve high rank in the police these days?
He's currently suspended.

Surely after lying about...
1) Being an officer in the Royal Navy & serving for 10yrs. When in actual fact he left after less than 2yrs & never achieved any rank above rating
2) Wearing a Falklands "conflict" medal. When he was only 15yrs old during said conflict.

He should never be allowed back. I hate cancel culture but this is different. Adderley is obviously an habitual liar & therefore he has no place in the police "farce". Let alone as a Chief Constable! He should be sacked with immediate effect & given no pension.
 

gazzatriumph

Legendary Knight
He's currently suspended.

Surely after lying about...
1) Being an officer in the Royal Navy & serving for 10yrs. When in actual fact he left after less than 2yrs & never achieved any rank above rating
2) Wearing a Falklands "conflict" medal. When he was only 15yrs old during said conflict.

He should never be allowed back. I hate cancel culture but this is different. Adderley is obviously an habitual liar & therefore he has no place in the police "farce". Let alone as a Chief Constable! He should be sacked with immediate effect & given no pension.
I hate cancel culture, but this isn't the same, if its true, it is a bbc report.
 

Big Sandy

Legendary Knight
Hmmm. I was talking to a friend last week, ex special branch. He was saying about a 30yr serving chief superintendent who was well known for coke use. One day they came into his office and said "random drug test time". He says no ..So that in itself is an admission of guilt...got on the blower to the chief constable and says "I think I'll retire today".

So was suspended, on full pay, until his retirement papers came through. Left on full pension.... His reason for not wanting the test on the day? He'd taken CBD oil and was afraid it would throw the rest.

Bollox ain't it?
 
Top