The Conspiracy Theorists Thread

MartytheMartian

Legendary Knight
Looking it up online the claim seems to be that it is actually something like a Casio QV10A and I think they are probably right. Time travel into the past seems to be impossible as the Universe just doesn't allow it. Time only travels forwards although it can travel forwards at different speeds.
 

MartytheMartian

Legendary Knight
Ah well you see, time travel forwards is no problem (relatively speaking) and has been proven. We have clocks accurate enough to measure the difference in how fast time passes at sea level in comparison to time in the lower gravity at the top of the Empire state building for example. Higher gravity equals slower passage of time and lower gravity equals faster passage of time. If you were able to reach the maximum amount of available gravity without being crushed to below the size of an atom then time would stop for you but not reverse.
Speed also affects how fast time travels for the person or object travelling (for everyone else it travels at it's normal speed that is why time is 'relative') There is an intrinsic balance that means that the faster you travel the slower time passes for you and the problem is that, if you were able to reach the speed of light (impossible as it would take more energy than exists in the entire universe to propel even a small object to light speed) time would stop for you and so you would be unable to exceed that speed and travel back in time. The universe has a speed limit and nothing can travel faster than it.
The final argument against time travel is entropy. That is that everything moves from an ordered state to a disordered state and there is no way back. To travel back in time would be to travel against the flow of entropy. The Universe simply doesn't like or allow time travel as it would seriously screw the place up having folks jumping backwards in time where individuals jumping forward does no harm whatsoever.
 

DD67

The Peace Keeper
Staff member
Looking it up online the claim seems to be that it is actually something like a Casio QV10A and I think they are probably right. Time travel into the past seems to be impossible as the Universe just doesn't allow it. Time only travels forwards although it can travel forwards at different speeds.
I'd say it's one of these not the Casio QV10A...
 

Attachments

  • 20210201_200541.jpg
    20210201_200541.jpg
    93.8 KB · Views: 2

Scrappy

Legendary Knight
Here's one for you, the news feed on my phone this morning showed the headline shown below regarding disease spreading mosquitoes. Immediately I though this was a bit of a coincidence seeing that a vaccine has just become available for malaria, and that Bill Gates is again involved in maleria vaccines and genetically modifying mosquitoes (I've said I like a good conspiracy theory ;)). So I tried to open the full article, only to find it no longer existed.

It appears I'm not the only one who found this a little suspicious: https://hugotalks.com/2021/05/12/mystery-uk-govt-mosquito-virus-warning-hugo-talks-lockdown/


Screenshot_20210512-062636.png


Malaria vaccine: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56858158

Bill Gates at it again 🙄: https://voi.id/en/bernas/20052/bill-gates-controversial-genetically-engineered-mosquito-comes-true


Could it be that they are already looking for the next excuse to keep the population in fear and in lockdown? 🤔
 

Doc Strange

Legendary Knight
It's all the same fucking day man!*

DS

*2p and a boiled sweet to whoever says who that's a quote from :)
 
T

The Departed

Guest

I read on Fukbook a group totally agreed that chemtrails are true. I swear, they made the flat earth society look fooked.
 

Scrappy

Legendary Knight
Here's another one...


Bill Gates involved again 🙄 and hillarious the man responsible for about the most insecure fallible operating system is involved in an organisation supposedly setup to prepare for a digital pandemic
 

Sarky B’stard

Legendary Knight
Some more thoughts on Gates’ lunacy….

 

Sarky B’stard

Legendary Knight
The World is over populated, it needs culling to survive.
Your analysis is flawed and consequently your deductions. What does ‘over populated’ actually mean and by what objective measures?

The economically developed World regulates its birth rate and has the resources to increasingly care for the environment. It is the less developed who maintain high birth rates to offset historic infant mortality, famine, etc., and who have the worst pollution.

Apart from which, who decides on the cull? And the final flaw in your logic is that a cull is necessary to survival. You could massively depopulate some parts of the World without impacting others.
 
Top