What’s made you happy for a change

Sarky B’stard

Legendary Knight
I am surprised you didn’t hear me 70 miles to your South West expectorating pretty much everything I had eaten yesterday. Something disagreed with me violently from about 1230 a.m. to the final purging at 0420 a.m. I have prescribed myself a restorative nap. I thought better of suggesting it was her cooking and no alcohol had passed my lips. Maybe that was it? 🤔
 

Don the Don

Legendary Knight
I am surprised you didn’t hear me 70 miles to your South West expectorating pretty much everything I had eaten yesterday. Something disagreed with me violently from about 1230 a.m. to the final purging at 0420 a.m. I have prescribed myself a restorative nap. I thought better of suggesting it was her cooking and no alcohol had passed my lips. Maybe that was it? 🤔
Hope you get sorted soon @Sarky B’stard there is nothing worse than that affliction for all in your household
 

Tallpaul

Legendary Knight
Indeed that law is why time has a direction. The energy required to re-instate order is enormous where to allow entropy to occur requires no energy. I believe the same law is why civilisations decay as ours is currently doing.

My personal theory is that at the 'Big Bang' there was one massively energetic particle which had no mass, what I like to call the primeval photon. The purest entity in the universe with, because it was one, the lowest state of entropy possible, perfect order. At the big bang that photon burst forth, and started to decay into matter as spacetime came into being and all the four forces we now know were born. Ever since then pure energy has been decaying into more and more matter with less and less energy. However I believe that ultimately there will be another low entropy state achieved where the universe is nothing but matter (gathered into so-called black holes), Great big black lumps of pure matter with zero energy. A few trillion years from now they will coalesce into one incredibly gigantic black sphere and cease their motion and even draw in spacetime itself at which point the universe in any shape or form will end.
Way too deep for me Bruh!
 

MartytheMartian

Legendary Knight
Admittedly Astrophysics and quantum physics are almost as much religions as they are sciences though most of the devotees would deny it. Because we are largely cut off from everything outisde of our own planets atmosphere and can't really 'see' things at a quantum level much of it is conjecture and best guess. Sure the maths seems to work but that doesn't mean that the universe needs to obey it. Things like String Theory and concepts such as the one where we exist within a computer simulation created by our own descendants some time in the future or that the world is actually two dimensional and only appears to have four dimensions or even the 'Block Universe' theory would be laughed at if they were preached by a religion but are taken seriously because there is no way to prove otherwise and they have Mathematics which seems to back them up as possibilities. I suppose that you could say that Mathematics is the religion of most Astro and Quantum physicists. It's just a pity that I loathe maths!
 

MartytheMartian

Legendary Knight
Yes one and one equals two in human mathematics but the universe doesn't care about human mathematics and it's calculations could result in a myriad of different answers each time it does the calculation. Isaac Newton believed that his theory of gravity was correct because what he observed agreed with his mathematics but it turned out that it was only 'close enough for jazz' and it took Einstein to realise that, while the maths gave a 'good enough' answer it wasn't actually the correct answer. Even now, although we accept Einstein's theorems because they agree with our observations they may not, again, actually be correct but simply appear to be correct. We try to fit the mathematics to what we observe and it often seems that the two agree but it ain't necessarily so. In this crazy mixed up universe quantum physics includes the idea that particles can pop into and out of existence without rhyme or reason and can essentially be everywhere and anywhere until we look at them in which case we cause a collapse and pin them down. So, in quantum terms you could have one plus one but, when you go to do the calculation you discover that one or both of them have popped out of existence and you have a different result than expected. We take the speed of light in a vacuum as a 'constant' and so, theoretically, if you were able to reach the speed of light yourself travelling in the same direction as a beam of light, you would find it to appear stationary, like two cars both travelling at the same speed and one car is stationary relative to the observer in the other car but no, even if you were travelling at the speed of light that beam of light would be travelling at exactly the speed of light relative to you if you measured it. logically that doesn't compute but it's real. Light seems to be the one thing in the entire universe that doesn't experience and isn't affected by time.
 
Top