The Conspiracy Theorists Thread

[MartytheMartian]

Sadly 98% of humans are sheep and fuckwits and rebels are few and far between. We'd like to think that most people will be in the 'Resistance' but, those willing to stand and fight are a very small fraction of the population unless a leader arises who can persuade the sheep that they are better off on the side of resistance and the authorities know what to look for and are keeping an eye out for such leadership candidates ready to destroy them before they so much as get a toe hold. The War is already lost and Civilisation as we know it will soon be a distant memory.

 

[DD67]

We'd like to think that most people will be in the 'Resistance' but, those willing to stand and fight are a very small fraction of the population unless a leader arises who can persuade the sheep that they are better off on the side of resistance

Hold my beer!

Where's @BAD LUCK DUCK when we need him? Hopefully he's doing a stocktake of the peasant army weapons cache

 

[half ton]

Sadly Scrappy I think it's too late already. I will just wait for the rebellion and go out fighting .... I don't think most of us will have a reason to just exist , so being a thorn in the governments side will be a pleasure ... I also think there will be a civil war as far to many sheep still support Sunak and his cronies

 

[DD67]

He talks a lot of sense. And I 100% agree with what he says.
However, the deeply suspicious old git in me can't help but wonder how he gets away with what he says?
Other YouTubers have been cancelled/de-platformed for expressing far less antagonistic views on the government & globalists etc etc.

Is Neil a plant to see who among us supports his views?
I feel the same way about Russell Brand as well.

 

[half ton]

He talks a lot of sense. And I 100% agree with what he says.
However, the deeply suspicious old git in me can't help but wonder how he gets away with what he says?
Other YouTubers have been cancelled/de-platformed for expressing far less antagonistic views on the government & globalists etc etc.

Is Neil, a plant to see who among us supports his views?
I feel the same way about Russell Brand as well.

I think he picks his words very carefully, They would have a really hard job cancelling him now,
As for Russell Brand , I used to hate the guy but he does put info out there even if in my eyes he is just stirring the pot a lot of the time.

 

[Scrappy]

Both Neil Oliver and Russell Brand have large global audiences, and both have influential friends, so I think if anyone did try to cancel them it would backfire massively. Also both, and Neil in particular, are intelligent men, who as HT said, choose their word carefully.

I also used to despise Russell Brand, but he is calling out the corruption and injustices, and I'm also becoming to believe there is something in his idea of more local independent governance, I certainly believe in less government and more individual responsibility for ones own actions and welfare.

Government should only be there as a safety net to provide assistance when its truly needed, not to dictate to people how they should live their lives. The common law idea of "do no harm" should be our guiding principal, where you can live your life as you see fit, so long as you cause no harm to others. If harm is caused, then the severity of any crime and the appropriate punishment should both be determined on an individual case basis by independent juries of ones peers. We are free living individuals who are sovereign in our own right, and no one should have the right to tell us how we should live our lives, so long as we are not interfering with anyone else.

 

[half ton]

Both Neil Oliver and Russell Brand have large global audiences, and both have influential friends, so I think if anyone did try to cancel them it would backfire massively. Also both, and Neil in particular, are intelligent men, who as HT said, choose their word carefully.

I also used to despise Russell Brand, but he is calling out the corruption and injustices, and I'm also becoming to believe there is something in his idea of more local independent governance, I certainly believe in less government and more individual responsibility for ones own actions and welfare.

Government should only be there as a safety net to provide assistance when its truly needed, not to dictate to people how they should live their lives. The common law idea of "do no harm" should be our guiding principal, where you can live your life as you see fit, so long as you cause no harm to others. If harm is caused, then the severity of any crime and the appropriate punishment should both be determined on an individual case basis by independent juries of ones peers. We are free living individuals who are sovereign in our own right, and no one should have the right to tell us how we should live our lives, so long as we are not interfering with anyone else.

Couldn't agree more Scrappy

 

[Scrappy]

Looks like the establishment might try to cancel Russell Brand after all...

What's the betting that nearly all the comedians targeted are considered right-wing anti-establishment? Especially as it's Channel 4, the government owned propaganda outlet.

 

[Scrappy]

Re above ∆

 

[Public Enemy]

Russell Brand accused of rape and sexual assault

The comedian and actor denies allegations about his behaviour over a period of seven years - and performs a scheduled gig.

www.bbc.co.uk

Here it comes.......

 

[DD67]

Russell Brand accused of rape and sexual assault

The comedian and actor denies allegations about his behaviour over a period of seven years - and performs a scheduled gig.

www.bbc.co.uk

Here it comes.......

It would seem that my very recent comment about Brand & Oliver getting away with saying what they do.
Might have been a little premature?

Q all the "premature" jokes

 

[smib]

Russell Brand accused of rape and sexual assault

The comedian and actor denies allegations about his behaviour over a period of seven years - and performs a scheduled gig.

www.bbc.co.uk

Here it comes.......

I always thought he was a "Chutney"
🫣

 

[DD67]

I always thought he was a "Chutney"
🫣

No, he's a real babe magnet. Which makes the claims that he's a rapist even less likely to be true IMHO.

Unless it turns out to be like the numerous cases of girls claiming to have been raped by premier league footballers. In almost every case they were drunk & star struck. They went back to the guys house & voluntarily went to his bedroom. Then "claim" to have said no to sex?

I can't help thinking the rape allegation only comes about when the guy puts her in a cab the following morning. And the reality suddenly dawns that it's back to the till at Tesco on Monday. Not the millionaire lifestyle of a footballers wife.

I'm not saying that there aren't genuine cases of what is an horrific crime. But for those in my scenario above. I reckon social media is to blame. Youngsters want what they see on reality TV shows. To a pretty girl, a rich footballer is their ticket to just such a lifestyle.

I agree with Katie's take on it...

 

[Sarky B’stard]

The question to ask is why him, why now? It's not as if his reputation wasn't well know. I suspect it has far more to do with the MSM now acting as corporate shills (unwitting or not) and Brand being over the target with his podcasts. Hence flak. And he can't prove consent any more than they can disprove it so long after they event - but it attacks his credibility.

 

[MartytheMartian]

I hate the fact that, since the 'Metoo' movement gathered steam, along with BLM and LGBTQ we have developed a situation where the actual legal requirement to prove anything has been thrown out the window and a person can now find themselves declared guilty by the media with no requirement to provide evidence. Folks just have to say that MrX did such and such to me twenty years ago and he is automatically found guilty by the media. At one time splashing such damaging allegations around without proof and so long after the fact would have seen the accuser in court.

 

[Sarky B’stard]

Look at the Salmond prosecution. A known sleaze, a self imagined Lothario but the whole thing collapsed because the taint of 'what did they expect?' seemed to permeate the behaviour and evidence of his alleged victims who allowed themselves to be cornered. Brand's very reputation seems to have attracted bees to honey..... or mustard or whatever.
The problem is seldom did 'it' happen but between people who knew one another what the agreement was at the time ..... not afterwards.

 

[Scrappy]

The fact that no one came forward when the METOO crap was at its height is suspicious to me, the media and the police where pleading with people to contact them.

What pisses me off is the fact that the woman who was 16 at the time an alleged event took place, is saying she was groomed, which is possible, but that sounds to me like she possibly may have been coached by Channel 4 or the Times to use that language, after all she was of legal consent age and at the time Brand was about 32, so its only morally wrong and not illegal, but they are deliberately using language associated with paedophiles. Yet how many pop stars have had relationships with 16 year old girls and very little negative is said about it.

Also compare attitudes to all the hideous, evil, and extremely violent crimes committed by the rape gangs, that were covered up for years, with failure to act in some cases because the under age girls were described by the authorities as promiscuous and consenting

I also got proved wrong very quickly when I said I didn't think RB and NO would be cancelled because they had a large audience and influential friends. I really hope there is nothing they can throw at Neil Oliver, or fabricate.

 

[Scrappy]

 

[Scrappy]

I might be being too paranoid, but I've noticed that when you share a YT video that it appends an ID to the URL, I suspect that this is so that the source of videos on social media can be traced, and I have concerns about this.

For example, you get something like this below added on to the end of the video URL, you can delete this part (everything from the ? onwards) and the video link will still work
?si=YMt5W8TWATfu66FU

 

[Sarky B’stard]

Not that my opinion is worth much but I happen to think this is bang on the money..... if you'll pardon the expression.

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com