BAD LUCK DUCK
Forum Duck
He's been hanging about with our @Sarky B’stard to be coming out with words like penuryHe's very observant, is our Chas
He's been hanging about with our @Sarky B’stard to be coming out with words like penuryHe's very observant, is our Chas
What I post on Mumsnet stays on Mumsnet, ok?Chas just doesn't want to come outright
Ducks have giant DicksChas just doesn't want to come outright and call you a dickDuck. It's a euphemism.
Fixed that for ya mate.Ducks ARE giant Dicks
Because we are all gentlemen on here HV. And you Sir are a cad & a bounder!Why has no-one used the headline "Khan gets Dick out!"
I drive a Jaaaaggg and wanna be a cad and a bounderBecause we are all gentlemen on here HV. And you Sir are a cad & a bounder!
Actually, the truth is. Nobody else thought of it. It took a special kind of deviant to think it up!
Brilliant!
I'd keep quiet if I were youDucks have giant Dicks
Duck hunting season isn’t until September, so he’s safe!Is that after the Duck breeding season
Take a deep breath.... it's not 'the system' so much as rational protection. A property with a sitting tenant with rights of occupation/security of tenure is worth less than one with vacant possession. You can usually repossess your own home to re-occupy it but otherwise there needs to be a breach of tenancy.My mother following her fall a couple of weeks ago, now needs to be looked after in a care home. She owns her own home, so we came up with a plan to get the maximum from her assets, so as to provide care for as many years as possible. This plan involved releasing some equity out of her house, and then renting the house out to generate an income. However I've just found out that you can't release equity from a property if you are not living in it, even if it is to provide for care - What an absolute disgrace, the system fucking you over again, to strip you of your assets as quickly as possible
Take a deep breath.... it's not 'the system' so much as rational protection. A property with a sitting tenant with rights of occupation/security of tenure is worth less than one with vacant possession. You can usually repossess your own home to re-occupy it but otherwise there needs to be a breach of tenancy.
So why lend on a property you can't necessarily recover your money from? It's as much financial sense as 'the system'.
Have you run through your options with an IFA? And ask who/how much commission he gets on each deal!
Sounds like the snag is 'who owns' because your Mum will never re-occupy. You may be able to leverage the equity if it goes to her kids and there may be tax advantages too in an 'inter vivos disposition'. Presumably the Financial Conduct Authority have set rules to prevent the possibility of any negative equity arising?
There's an underlying principle in much English law that property is treated as cash and any investment is a temporary vehicle pending its re-conversion to cash..... certainly applies to joint ownership ..... It's why I suggest an IFA . There may be a mechanism to avoid having to sell while generating income but it begs the question whether you want the house itself or the value wrapped up in it. And I don't discount your mother's feelings or desire to maximise inheritance.
Sometimes it comes down to what you actually want rather than what you think you want. I know with my own parents it wasn't quite we first thought.
It's probably the lot that fired Sturgeon! They went into admin a year ago?All her assets were previously in a trust, that we only recently managed to get out of, literally weeks before the solicitors managing it went bust, some poor soles had been trying to get their relations assets back for a couple of years even before they went pop. The solicitors were McClures on Glasgow, if you want to read some horror stories check them out.
Log into Facebook
Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.www.facebook.com