On social media there is a lot of "for God's sake don't antagonise the Russki's or they might nuke us" going on whenever anyone suggests that we should actually contemplate taking Putin on. I gather some morning TV presenter, think it was one called Susanna Reid? started a panicked 'why are you trying to start a nuclear war' outcry when she was asking Raab about creating a No-fly Zone over Ukraine. I am becoming rather depressed and suspect that once Kyiv falls and all those brave souls who opposed Putin are killed or, more than likely executed by the Russians we as a world will all turn our backs on Ukraine and pretend it never happened. I have little hope for the human race.
As our resident Tactical Expert
@Sarky B’stard what is your guess about how things will progress?
Well you flatter me and my crystal balls. However, terminology:
Grand Strategic is supposed to be for politicians taking all sorts of high level specialist advice about national objectives. With hostilities those objectives are converted into military directives about desired outcomes.....
The military bit splits three ways:
where the operational level links tactical actions together to achieve strategic success. Tactics can cover anything from one aircraft to a Brigade or Flotilla. We had the odd occasion in NI where a quick thinking Cpl achieved a strategic effect e.g. saving Gery Adams from bleeding out.....
I think your question is more concerned with strategy. What's he trying to achieve and how is he effectively countered/defeated?
My simple answer is we don't yet know Putin's precise aims but you can guess as well as me. You can speculate how events may turn out but there are a range of possibilities from conventional warfare degenerating into guerrilla attacks through to Putin being taken out by his own if he tries to overstep their limits..... whatever they are.
In short your guess is as good as mine and that's for lack of decent intelligence via the MSM.