I'm afraid I think you were nearer the mark in suspicious git mode.I hope it's the real deal Chas.
Leaflets should be handed out in Calais informing them of the new arrangement.
It might stop them attempting the crossing. Thereby reducing the income stream for the people traffickers & potentially save lives.
I just can't help thinking the proposed arrangement is far too good to be true
It's a feckin long walk back to Calais
View attachment 16320
If they can get that through the house then they are on to a winner, I bet every liberal for miles will be up in arms about it yet they still complain nothing is being done to curb the problem.
Just stop givin em owt when they get here. Soon stop comin!
It is a long way back and it’s not cheap either!!I hope it's the real deal Chas.
Leaflets should be handed out in Calais informing them of the new arrangement.
It might stop them attempting the crossing. Thereby reducing the income stream for the people traffickers & potentially save lives.
I just can't help thinking the proposed arrangement is far too good to be true
It's a feckin long walk back to Calais
View attachment 16320
"Aye up" @Foxy your going to get some new neighbours in yorkshire, was a decent camp home of the old Tucano training aircraftJust stop givin em owt when they get here. Soon stop comin!
I was listening to the Jeremy Vine show today.The shrieking liberals are about to get deafening, there is going to be a deluge of salty tears
View attachment 16336
Others do it so it can workThey made that sound like it's a bad thing?!?
If the illegals are genuine asylum seekers.Others do it so it can work
Which other countries send asylum seekers overseas?
The UK is to give some asylum seekers a one-way ticket to Rwanda. What policies have other nations taken?www.bbc.com
You could be wrong my little pinko friendI'm afraid I think you were nearer the mark in suspicious git mode.
It's purely to shift the news cycle, I'd say cynically extreme to guarantee it'll never pass. They know it wouldn't go through, no interest in making it go through.
They are hoping for the Double of a story shift and looking big and tough on immigration. There is absolutely no intention to implement it.
Or it could also support my pointYou could be wrong my little pinko friend
View attachment 16342
I know where there’s a nice camp there, not too far outside of Freetown …They need to repeal relevant 'uman Rights legislation and give the judges minimal room for creative interpretation. Then face down all the predictable howling. Still think we should have gone to Sierra Leone as ships carry far more for less!
and he knows that. It's pure cynicism and populism over policy (imho)Can’t see it getting through the Lords no matter how much Boris blusters…..
I like the fact that it's going to be retrospective. Anyone arriving since January, is going to be fucked off. Not far enough back for me though. It should cover every one of the fuckers, no matter how long they have been here.I was listening to the Jeremy Vine show today.
The bit where he has a phone in about a hot topic.
The folk that were up for the Rwanda idea were like listening to most of you guys.
However (as predicted) those against the idea were trotting out words/phrases such as "shameful" "infringement of human rights" etc etc
The best argument the lefties could come up with was..."It'll be a one way ticket to Rwanda. The (illegal) immigrants will never have their asylum cases dealt with fairly. And will never make it to the UK"...
They made that sound like it's a bad thing?!?